AAIYUGBeta
HomeRaceLeaderboardResultsWall of FameMessagesProfileLitepaperBlogNews
AAIYUG

A skill-based trading competition platform.

✉ hello@aiyug.com

Dubai, United Arab Emirates

PRE-LAUNCH · REGISTRATION IN PROGRESS
Platform
Live raceLeaderboardResultsWall of FameHow it worksLitepaperBlogMarkets newsJoin free
Legal
Terms & ConditionsPrivacy PolicyCompetition RulesRisk Disclaimer

Simulated trading only. No real money is traded. AIYUG is not financial advice and is not a regulated financial service. Read the full risk disclaimer →

© 2026 AIYUG. All rights reserved.

HomeRaceLeadersResultsMessagesProfile
Blog
Race Recaps· 13 July 2026 · 4 min read

Pratik Chaudhari Tops Week 2 — 0.00% Return in a Tight Forex Field

Week 2 of AIYUG forex saw Pratik Chaudhari win the Investor Spotlight with a conservative approach: two trades, zero net return, and preserved capital. Here’s how that steady setup beat inactivity and overreach.

A
AIYUG Desk
Race analysis team

Hook — A quiet win that still earned the spotlight

Pratik Chaudhari finished Week 2 of AIYUG's forex race at the top of a compact, 14-entrant field with a 0.00% return. That number looks flat on its face, but in a week where many participants made no moves at all, Pratik’s two executed trades and preserved capital were enough to claim the leaderboard’s #1 spot and this week’s Investor Spotlight.

Leaderboard — Top 5 (Week 2, Forex)

RankNameReturn %Trades
1Pratik Chaudhari0.00%2
2Test0.00%0
3Aiyug Admin0.00%0
4nilkanth tandel0.00%0
5kapil0.00%0

The winning setup — conservative, deliberate, and capital-preserving

We have limited metadata on Pratik’s exact trade entries, exits, or instruments (the public submission lists those fields as null). What is clear from the record:

  • Instrument: not disclosed (null)
  • Direction / Side: not disclosed (null)
  • Style: not disclosed (null)
  • Stops / Targets: stop_loss_pct = 0, targets = null
  • Execution: 2 completed trades, both netting to a 0.00% overall return

Because the dataset shows two trades but a zero percent net change, the practical interpretation is that Pratik either:

  • closed both trades near break-even, or
  • offset gains and losses across the two trades resulting in a net zero, or
  • intentionally sized positions and stops to protect capital and avoid large drawdowns.

Whatever the precise mechanics, the observable setup communicates a risk-aware approach: limited activity (two trades only), and an outcome that preserved starting equity for the week.

What separated the top from the rest

With many competitors showing zero trades for the week, the distinctions in this race were subtle:

  • Active vs Inactive: Several entrants recorded zero trades. Pratik’s two trades gave him activity on the board while still preserving capital — a combination that edged out inactive entries in the ranking algorithm.
  • Risk control: Even without explicit stop or target values in the public record, closing a week flat after two trades suggests attention to position sizing and trade management rather than attempting to chase outsized returns.
  • Discipline over speculation: In a field with few market decisions, a disciplined pair of trades that avoid big losses can outperform both impulsive overtrading and complete passivity when the ranking metric rewards return percentage and capital preservation.

One practical lesson from Week 2

When competition is tight and markets are uncertain, preserving capital and executing a few well-considered trades can be a winning strategy. You don’t have to be “right” on every market move to finish strong — consistent risk management, modest position sizing, and disciplined exits often matter more than chasing large returns. For contest participants, document your rationale and trade management rules even if you opt to trade infrequently: that discipline is visible in outcomes.

Final notes

This recap is descriptive of results and public submissions only. It does not imply a recommendation, endorse any specific instrument or strategy, or guarantee future results.

Join the next AIYUG race and test your approach: https://aiyug.us/signup

FAQ

How did Pratik win with a 0.00% return?

Pratik recorded two trades and finished the week flat overall. In this week’s small field and based on the ranking rules (return %), active execution combined with preserved capital put him ahead of many participants who recorded no trades.

Why are many entries showing 0 trades or null setup fields?

This race uses paper trading and public submission fields are optional. A number of entrants either chose not to trade during the week or did not publish trade metadata, which is why some fields appear as null or show zero trades.

Does this recap provide trading advice I should follow?

No. The recap describes what happened in the competition and highlights observable behavior. It does not constitute financial advice or guarantees about results. Always do your own research and consider your risk tolerance before trading.

Race recapsTrading CompetitionForex Trading

Put it into practice — free

Join this week’s AIYUG race: virtual capital, real market data, real recognition from investors. No deposit, no KYC.

Keep reading
Race Recaps · 17 Jul 2026 · 4 min

Ravi Kapoor Tops SOL Volatility QA Test Race — 0.06% Return

Ravi Kapoor edged out a crowded SOLUSDT field with a conservative MACD day setup, posting a 0.06% return in Week 4’s 20-bot crypto trading competition.

Race Recaps · 12 Jul 2026 · 4 min

nilkanth tandel Tops Crypto Sprint with 0.00% Return

In a short but instructive Week 4 of AIYUG’s Crypto Sprint, nilkanth tandel took first place with a disciplined, all-cash approach that preserved capital—ending the week flat while a more active runner-up finished level after four trades. A lesson in execution and risk control.

Race Recaps · 11 Jul 2026 · 4 min

Pratik Chaudhari wins Crypto Sprint Week 3 — +0.03% top return

Pratik Chaudhari took the Week 3 Crypto Sprint crown with four small, disciplined trades that edged out the field for a +0.03% return. A lesson in modest sizing, active management, and consistency.